![]() |
| |||
| Did vista remove the Windows audio converter that I loved so much with XP? I can't find it anywhere, and I can't find it in help topics anywhere. I know how to change the file type when I rip a CD but right now I have alot of WMA files that I want converted to MP3 and I can't find a way to get vista to do that. Any suggestions? |
| |||
| On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:35:00 -0700, Noja <Noja@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >Did vista remove the Windows audio converter that I loved so much with XP? I >can't find it anywhere, and I can't find it in help topics anywhere. I know >how to change the file type when I rip a CD but right now I have alot of WMA >files that I want converted to MP3 and I can't find a way to get vista to do >that. Any suggestions? It's basically the same old story. Even with all the cash Microsoft has lying around they are TOO CHEAP to pay the license fee for a MP3 encoder/decoder for all versions of Vista. If you already have Nero or Roxio they both do it, if not all kinds of inexpensive shareware. |
| |||
| "Noja" <Noja@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:9C3ED405-D676-4198-99E1-CDBAB7F3EC0B@microsoft.com... > Did vista remove the Windows audio converter that I loved so much with XP? > I > can't find it anywhere, and I can't find it in help topics anywhere. I > know > how to change the file type when I rip a CD but right now I have alot of > WMA > files that I want converted to MP3 and I can't find a way to get vista to > do > that. Any suggestions? Which audio converter would that be? XP didn't have one which could convert WMA to MP3 natively, probably an additional media player pack or something. I've used http://www.dbpoweramp.com/dmc.htm in the past which is quite good, free, but the MP3 encoders are only trialware I believe. Or you could re-rip the music directly to MP3 using Windows Media Player. -- Paul Smith, Yeovil, UK. Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User. http://www.dasmirnov.net/blog/ http://www.windowsresource.net/ *Remove nospam. to reply by e-mail* |
| |||
| Or you could look at it that they give YOU the choice, you pay your money and buy the facilities you want? -- Graham Hughes MVP Digital Media www.myvideoproblems.com > > It's basically the same old story. Even with all the cash Microsoft > has lying around they are TOO CHEAP to pay the license fee for a MP3 > encoder/decoder for all versions of Vista. |
| |||
| On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:02:51 +0100, "Graham Hughes" <graham.hughes@dvds2treasure.co.uk> wrote: >Or you could look at it that they give YOU the choice, you pay your money >and buy the facilities you want? Being a MVP doesn't mean you're suppose to become some Microsoft apologist. Since on average Vista as a upgrade costs around $200, is it too much to expect it to support common file types natively? That Vista out of the box doesn't support two of the most popular, MPEG-2 and MP3 for ALL versions of Vista simply points to Microsoft being cheap like I said. |
| |||
| excellent FREEWARE, a bit clumsy in the interface, but it works really well and has dozens of choices and settings. http://www.koyotesoft.com/indexEn.html Free Mp3 Wma Converter V1.6.3 Free Mp3 Wma Converter can Convert all your Mp3, Wma, Ogg, Aac, M4a, Ac3, Ape, Flac, Wav files : - Mp3 to Ogg, Mp3 to Wma, Mp3 to AAC, Mp3 to Wav ... - WAV to Mp3, Wav to Ogg, Wav to AAC, Wav to Wma ... - Wma to Mp3, Wma to Ogg, Wma to AAC, Wma to Wav ... - Ogg to Mp3, Ogg to Wma, Ogg to AAC, Ogg to Wav ... - AAC to Mp3, AAC to Wma, AAC to Ogg, AAC to Wav ... - Ape to Mp3, Ape to Wma, Ape to Ogg, Ape to Wav ... - Flac to Mp3, Flac to Wma, Flac to Ogg, Flac to Wav ... - M4a to Mp3, M4a to Wma, M4a to Ogg, M4a to Wav ... - Ac3 to Mp3, Ac3 to Wma, Ac3 to Ogg, Ac3 to Wav ... You will be able to convert you Itunes music library (m4a format) to mp3, wma, ogg, etc... "Noja" wrote: > Did vista remove the Windows audio converter that I loved so much with XP? I > can't find it anywhere, and I can't find it in help topics anywhere. I know > how to change the file type when I rip a CD but right now I have alot of WMA > files that I want converted to MP3 and I can't find a way to get vista to do > that. Any suggestions? |
| |||
| The Audio Converter was part of the Plus! pack, not a part of XP. I have it on my computer, as I upgraded from XP to Vista. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/plus/default.mspx "Noja" <Noja@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:9C3ED405-D676-4198-99E1-CDBAB7F3EC0B@microsoft.com... > Did vista remove the Windows audio converter that I loved so much with XP? > I > can't find it anywhere, and I can't find it in help topics anywhere. I > know > how to change the file type when I rip a CD but right now I have alot of > WMA > files that I want converted to MP3 and I can't find a way to get vista to > do > that. Any suggestions? |
| |||
| I am not an apologist just giving another side to your rather one-sided one. I think any company that offers choice is good, look at Vegas..... you know it well.... They produce a cheap version of the full price "professional" product.... it doesn't give customers everything that the full priced version does.... are you saying Sony are cheap for doing this? -- Graham Hughes MVP Digital Media www.myvideoproblems.com "Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message news:9g51i3tqedeniv13br60qh3lvas7eogk1f@4ax.com... > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:02:51 +0100, "Graham Hughes" > <graham.hughes@dvds2treasure.co.uk> wrote: > >>Or you could look at it that they give YOU the choice, you pay your money >>and buy the facilities you want? > > Being a MVP doesn't mean you're suppose to become some Microsoft > apologist. > > Since on average Vista as a upgrade costs around $200, is it too much > to expect it to support common file types natively? That Vista out of > the box doesn't support two of the most popular, MPEG-2 and MP3 for > ALL versions of Vista simply points to Microsoft being cheap like I > said. > |
| |||
| On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:52:29 +0100, "Graham Hughes" <graham.hughes@dvds2treasure.co.uk> wrote: >I am not an apologist just giving another side to your rather one-sided one. > >I think any company that offers choice is good, look at Vegas..... you know >it well.... They produce a cheap version of the full price "professional" >product.... it doesn't give customers everything that the full priced >version does.... are you saying Sony are cheap for doing this? Apples and oranges. Even the watered down versions of Vegas WORK. Movie Maker simply doesn't work for a lot of people even when doing simplistic things. Pretending otherwise and making endless excuses does suggest you're an apologist, since you and Zack are always quick to overlook and forgive the many flaws both Movie Maker and DVD Maker have. As far as the licensing for including MP3 and MPEG-2 support in all versions of Vista I don't pretend to know what the costs would be. I would hazard a guess at most a few dollars per copy. Considering Microsoft gets on average $200 for a copy of Vista not including support for common file types can only be called penny pinching. As far as the differences between the full version of Vegas and lessor versions they don't withhold support for common files types. The differences is in the level of tools included. For example the professional version includes scopes that show the waveform of files and an unlimited number of tracks, stuff that only serious hobbyists and professionals would need or want and are willing to pay extra for. I don't have to guess most people WANT to rip MP3 CD's and make DVD's, that area of interest has now exploded in popularity over the past couple years and is accelerating. |
| |||
| I don't overlook the flaws in MM - I note you are still to answer the post re MP3 in Vegas?? I, and the other MVP's are very hard on MS, we just don't do it publicly. We have private spaces where we discuss the problems. We take what we have here and try to get MS to work on these factors.... Items like working well with mp3's is always asked for, but then Vegas doesn't always work with them either....... We jump up and down asking for the app to work with Mpegs, but at the end of the day I don't work for MS, and I can't make them do anything........ all I can do is try to get the people who are here and having problems working again. Some may be better off working with other apps, and some don't want to, so there is no point in telling them MM is crap use vegas or adobe or pinnacle..... they just want to use MM so I just try my best to get them working. -- Graham Hughes MVP Digital Media www.myvideoproblems.com "Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message news io1i3hqop91r61ckbeb37nglbvn64tptv@4ax.com...> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:52:29 +0100, "Graham Hughes" > <graham.hughes@dvds2treasure.co.uk> wrote: > >>I am not an apologist just giving another side to your rather one-sided >>one. >> >>I think any company that offers choice is good, look at Vegas..... you >>know >>it well.... They produce a cheap version of the full price "professional" >>product.... it doesn't give customers everything that the full priced >>version does.... are you saying Sony are cheap for doing this? > > Apples and oranges. Even the watered down versions of Vegas WORK. > Movie Maker simply doesn't work for a lot of people even when doing > simplistic things. Pretending otherwise and making endless excuses > does suggest you're an apologist, since you and Zack are always quick > to overlook and forgive the many flaws both Movie Maker and DVD Maker > have. > > As far as the licensing for including MP3 and MPEG-2 support in all > versions of Vista I don't pretend to know what the costs would be. I > would hazard a guess at most a few dollars per copy. Considering > Microsoft gets on average $200 for a copy of Vista not including > support for common file types can only be called penny pinching. > > As far as the differences between the full version of Vegas and lessor > versions they don't withhold support for common files types. The > differences is in the level of tools included. For example the > professional version includes scopes that show the waveform of files > and an unlimited number of tracks, stuff that only serious hobbyists > and professionals would need or want and are willing to pay extra for. > I don't have to guess most people WANT to rip MP3 CD's and make DVD's, > that area of interest has now exploded in popularity over the past > couple years and is accelerating. >
|